Thread:Grooox/@comment-33224520-20151228145300/@comment-9415452-20151228145908

Italian Mysterious Contributor wrote: Admins have to not be annoying or else other users will start hating them and will revolt and shit will happen like it did with Reagan.

Yes, we need a solid policy, strict when it's needed, but objective and community-made. Not just admin-invented bossy rules that will lead to hate against 'em.

Also, it's better to don't have an only leader to avoid dictatorship (that's why I still doubt to have you as a PB Wiki owner). A triarchy would reduce dictatorship chance since two admins on three are needed to have something approved.

Obviously, some facts won't need to wait for admins' full consensum and may get a preventive (temporary) ban if REALLY needed. Pretty sure we have to be annoying like me, maturity is something important for us, if we don't be annoying, we are gonna get anything else as Admin, no revolt has ever happen, they can hate me, let them hate me, even if they are acommodated with themselves

We need Reagan rules, those rules are the one we need, we need to be mature, strong and respectfull, thats what those rules are saying, if we don't adopt those rules, we will be acting like such child

Im pretty sure that when Reagan was the sole Owner, im sure it was very nice, Reagan did what he should do, thanks to him this Community is alive, but now you are ruining it, you dont listen to him, Dictatorships are very needed, a Triarchy would result in chaos, because we aren't just like the same, there would be intolerance to the other, 1 leader should own the Wika, he knows what he is doing, he does this for us

And yes, bans are needed, they are like hitting on the ruller, if the student does any sh*t, here comes the ruller to give him a lesson